Methodology
Each article should distinguish verified fact, first-hand observation, attributed opinion, forecast and editorial inference. Material claims should link to primary sources or timestamped source notes wherever practical.
For video-derived drafts, BBR binds every transcript to the exact YouTube video ID. The preferred source order is Studio-authored English captions, a high-confidence matched editorial transcript, then public YouTube captions. A transcript verifies what was said in the episode; it does not make every statement independently true.
Insider Interview pages preserve one complete conversation per guest or episode. They use short, timestamped caption checkpoints to make the source inspectable and keep claims attributed to the speaker. An interview is valuable primary testimony, but it is not automatically an independent legal opinion, market dataset, technical test or endorsement.
The verification layer is separate. BBR checks external claims against the most authoritative available records—normally official statistics, current regulations, local-government notices or first-party platform documentation—and states both what each source supports and what it cannot prove. Observational market theses remain labelled as hypotheses when no appropriate audited dataset exists.
Editorial policy
BBR reporting should remain useful to readers before it becomes useful to promotion. Commercial relationships, conflicts and company-published figures must be disclosed. Demonstration or AI-assisted copy must receive human editorial and factual review before publication.
Corrections
Material corrections should be visible, dated and appended to the article. Silent edits are appropriate only for spelling, formatting or similarly non-material changes.